2020 Mid-Year Market Insights Update | In Uncharted Territory, Leverage Knowledge

MacKay Municipal Managers’ Market Insights for 2020, published in January, noted that historically low yields and tight credit spreads positioned municipal bond investors in uncharted territory. The recommendation was to leverage market knowledge and position portfolios based on the key attributes of each bond held including structure, liquidity profile, rate sensitivity, and credit fundamentals. It was also noted that investor uncertainty in 2020, a presidential election year, over economic sustainability and stock market performance could lead to volatility. However, based on our belief in improving municipal credit fundamentals and favorable market technicals, we were prepared to be buyers in periods of volatility. During the spring of 2020, the municipal market experienced one of the deepest, swiftest dislocations seen in decades. While we did not foresee the tragic human impact and massive economic slowdown caused by COVID-19, our portfolios were well positioned. Initially, the market was impacted by a liquidity squeeze that was amplified by credit spread widening, as the implications of the abrupt shutdown of the economy became apparent.

The thesis MacKay Municipal Managers™ (“MMM”) employs remains intact and is further solidified by the four core pillars of our investment process:

1) Disciplined Security Selection – Strict credit review standards through all markets remains paramount, particularly during turbulent times.

2) Focus on Liquidity – Constructing portfolios that include short-term securities, rated bonds and bonds with a diverse buyer universe are at the core of every portfolio we manage.

3) Commitment to Diversification – Mitigating credit risk through diversification by geography, sector, issuer, credit rating, and yield curve positioning.

4) Flexible and Active Approach – Market volatility creates either risk or opportunity. The flexibility of our portfolios allow the credit research team, our traders, and our portfolio managers to seek out opportunities during market volatility and dislocations.


Rationale: As we begin 2020, municipal credit spreads are tight, the yield curve is relatively flat, and absolute yields are low. We believe the tax-exempt municipal market will maintain its strong technical and fundamental characteristics versus other fixed income asset classes. However, successful municipal investing in 2020 requires that investors plan, not hope: plan how to generate strong relative returns, not hope for another year of outsized absolute returns. To a large degree, the prospect for excess returns from additional rate declines and market-wide tightening of credit spreads will be limited, so the aggressive strategies of 2019 will leave investors exposed to unnecessary risk if volatility rises in 2020. As a result, we believe that a relative-value –based security selection strategy that incorporates rebalancing credit, reducing exposure to the long end of the market, and favoring 4% and higher coupon structures will likely lead to outperformance.

Portfolio in Action: The strong municipal performance and spread tightening experienced last year continued over the first two months of 2020. MMM reduced exposure to weaker credits, sub 4% coupons and very long maturity bonds.

As the entire market sold off, MMM selectively identified and acquired securities it believed would be best positioned for recovery based on credit, structure, and relative liquidity. For example, we bought insured bonds for those attributes. In addition, MMM executed tax swaps when prices declined to improve portfolio income and realize losses for better tax efficiency. We continued to actively trade portfolios as credit spreads began tightening in May and June.

Mid-Year Status: On Target Through June 30, 2020, the higher credit quality part of the market outperformed lower credit. Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Index BBB returned -2.05% vs. AA 2.73%.

Additionally, performance for sub 5% coupons varied throughout this volatile period, further emphasizing our belief that active management focusing on structure delivers. During the months of March and May, 5% and higher coupon bonds outperformed lower coupon bonds; the differentiation in performance amongst these structures varied greatly due to volatility in the market.


Rationale: We believe that an ongoing low rate environment, monetary policy on hold, and a mixed economic outlook point to coupon-dominant performance in 2020. However, the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, foreign trade, and the potential for weaker equity returns may create periods of notable volatility. Given the backdrop of strong technical conditions in the tax-exempt municipal market, prudent professional managers will seek to reward their investors by ‘buying the dips.’ However, it is essential for professional managers to maintain adequate liquidity in preparation for seizing those opportunities and critical that they employ an active trading strategy to subsequently monetize those positions.

Portfolio in Action: MMM built significant liquidity into its portfolios prior to the end of 2019. As a result, those portfolios were well positioned to weather the market’s reaction to COVID-19. In early March, that reaction could have been best described as a liquidity squeeze, and ill-prepared market participants were forced to sell bonds at significant discounts to intrinsic value to meet redemption obligations. MMM tactically employed its ample liquidity to ‘buy the dips’ and acquire bonds at attractive prices. As an asset management firm well positioned to ‘provide’ liquidity during the peak of the disruption, we further increased our market access, which benefits our client portfolios beyond this current time period.

Mid-Year Status: On Target Comparing active trading volume in some of our strategies showcased that during the first six months of 2020, we were able to proactively participate in the market in a meaningful way. Turnover percent in these strategies was 2x higher compared to the prior year. Although, our process has always involved being active, the rise in volatility allowed for tactical positioning as well.

Additionally, the ratio of buys and sells shows we were very engaged in the market finding opportunities to acquire bonds at attractive prices and taking the opportunity to implement tax loss swaps in the portfolio. During the deepest part of the dislocation — the last three weeks of March — the municipal bond industry experienced a historically steep selloff of approximately $27 billion in fund outflows.1


Rationale: Signs of distress appearing in certain pockets of the high yield municipal market suggest that poor security selection can lead to underperformance. Therefore, we believe a focus on avoiding losers rather than stretching for winners will be the more successful strategy to investing in high yield municipal bonds. In 2020, prudent high yield municipal investors will likely focus on quality income and avoid leveraged or speculative income.

Portfolio in Action: MMM believed credit spreads were too tight and investors were not being adequately compensated for exposure to credit risk. Throughout 2019, and right up to the COVID-19 disruption, MMM was increasing the credit quality of client portfolios while still remaining active and tactical.

As credit spreads widened in mid-March, MMM selectively began to add credit risk at significantly lower prices.

Based upon the re-inflation of credit spreads, MMM shifted its asset allocation model. On April 1, model allocation went to 70% investment grade and 30% high yield from the credit-neutral positioning of 80%/20%, respectively. MMM adjusted the allocation due to significantly wider spreads in high yield while also maintaining material exposure in Investment Grade due to the near-term total return opportunity.

Mid-Year Status: Pending Up until this point in 2020, there were segments of the high yield market where prices have not been fully transparent. However, as we see two-way flow return to the market, we expect prices to reflect reality over time.

At the same time, MMM has observed a bifurcation of strength and weakness within the high yield segment of the market, where segments generating more reliable, quality income have outperformed.

As of June 2020, sectors that have performed well in the Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal sector sub-indices are tobacco, electric, Puerto Rico, and water/sewer; returning 5.31%, 2.22%, 2.21%, and 0.28%, respectively. Conversely, there are pockets of the high yield municipal market that have shown weakness in 2020. For example, the worst performing sector among the high yield municipal sector sub-indices were: the hospital index (encompassing Continuing Care Retirement Communities) with year-to-date performance as of June 30, 2020 of -6.96% and the transportation index, returning -5.13% vs. the Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Index at -2.64%.


Rationale: Although interest rate dependent, we expect the 2019 surge in taxable municipal issuance to re-finance higher coupon tax-exempt debt will continue in 2020. This anticipated growth in the taxable segment of the municipal market should give it the size and scope to warrant inclusion in investor portfolios. A continuation of this issuance pattern would result in smaller, less sophisticated issuers being denied access to this re-financing activity, as the taxable market favors larger issuers of generally higher credit quality. We expect that taxable refunding activity will support supply-related technical conditions in the tax-exempt market, which will contribute to the overall market’s relative performance strength. The combination of reduced supply pressure, ongoing strong demand for tax-exempt income, and a shift in those credit sensitive sectors dictates even more need for sophisticated, credit-research– driven investment managers and prudent security selection.

Portfolio in Action: Based on the premise of continued taxable municipal issuance, MMM has dedicated strategies that we believe are well positioned to evaluate and capitalize on this segment of the market.

MMM continues to believe that the taxable municipal market has taken supply away from the tax-exempt market, which will be beneficial for the tax-exempt market in the long term.

Within taxable municipal portfolios, MMM continues to increase its exposure to more index eligible, larger, non-callable issuers. As hedging costs have decreased significantly, these index eligible issues have been sought after by a growing base of overseas buyers as well.

Mid-Year Status: On Target Through May, gross primary market volume was $160 billion, 21% above the post-Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (2018-19) average of $133 billion. The split between taxable and tax-exempt is striking, with tax-exempt issuance at $108.6 billion or 7.7% below the prior two-year average, while taxable issuance at $51.7 billion was 3.4x the $15.4 billion average in 2018-19.2

Looking at taxable municipal supply through June 30, 2020, MMM has seen shifts in issuance patterns across both deal sizes and average ratings. The historic issuance of BBB rated securities in the taxable municipal market has run between 5-6%, and year-to-date 2020, it is approximately 1%.3

There has also been a shift in issuance patterns in the tax-exempt market, with growth in deal sizes of $25 million or less, and a corresponding increase in $1 billion plus deal sizes in the taxable municipal market. These factors have inhibited access to the taxable municipal market for smaller, lower rated, less sophisticated issuers.4


Rationale: In 2020, coupons will likely be king but only when the quality of the income source is high. We believe that assertion will hold true in both the investment grade and high yield segments of the municipal market. To protect themselves, municipal investors should select professional guidance based on management style, not distribution rate. Investors should verify that their portfolio income is not reliant on strategies employing hidden leverage, excessive duration, speculative project bets, or short call bonds on the verge of retirement. While market conditions in the last number of years were very forgiving with respect to such tactics, a turnaround would bring to light the fragility of those investment approaches.

Portfolio in Action: Instead of employing a “maximum distribution yield strategy,” MMM defines value as a compelling dollar price along with a competitive yield, together contributing to maximizing total return. MMM believes that leverage may not be appropriate in all strategies. The events of March confirmed this position.

In addition, highly leveraged project finance deals came under scrutiny as the abrupt economic shutdown brought to light their fragile financial conditions.

What MMM focused on instead is reliable income and sought to achieve higher yields in client portfolios by adding lower priced bonds with higher book yields while focusing on solid credits.

Mid-Year Status: On Target The largest defaults the municipal market has seen thus far in 2020, have been in single site, single credit risk, and project finance issues. Approximately 90% of the default occurrences represent these types of credits5 which did not have broad revenues or government support in order to sustain the slowdown in economy. MMM has stayed away from such securities from a credit perspective even prior to the dislocation.

1Morningstar Data

2JPM Municipal Markets Weekly

3Citigroup Municipal Research

4Citigroup Municipal Research


Past performance is not indicative of future performance.


Comparisons to a financial index are provided for illustrative purposes only. Comparisons to the index are subject to limitations because portfolio holdings, volatility and other portfolio characteristics may differ materially from the index. There is no guarantee that any of the securities in the index are contained in any portfolio. The performance of the index assumes reinvestment of dividends but does not reflect the impact of fees, applicable taxes or trading costs which, unlike the index, may reduce the returns of a managed portfolio. Investors cannot invest in an index. Because of these differences, the performance of the index should not be relied upon as an accurate measure of comparison.


A rules-based, market-value-weighted index engineered for the long-term tax-exempt bond market. To be included in the index, bonds must be rated investment-grade (Baa3/BBB- or higher) by at least two of the following ratings agencies: Moody's, S&P, Fitch. If only two of the three agencies rate the security, the lower rating is used to determine index eligibility. If only one of the three agencies rates a security, the rating must be investment-grade. They must have an outstanding par value of at least $7 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $75 million. The bonds must be fixed rate, have a dated-date after December 31, 1990, and must be at least one year from their maturity date. Remarketed issues, taxable municipal bonds, bonds with floating rates, and derivatives, are excluded from the benchmark. The index has four main sectors: general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, insured bonds (including all insured bonds with a Aaa/AAA rating), and pre-refunded bonds. Most of the index has historical data to January 1980. In addition, sub-indices have been create based on maturity, state, sector, quality, and revenue source, with inception dates later than January 1980.


An unmanaged index of municipal bonds with the following characteristics: fixed coupon rate, credit rating of Ba1 or lower or non-rated using the middle rating of Moody's, S&P, and Fitch, outstanding par value of at least $3 million, and issued as part of a transaction of at least $20 million. In addition, the bonds must have a dated-date after December 31, 1990 and must be at least one year from their maturity date.


Bloomberg Index Services Limited. BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Bloomberg”). BARCLAYS® is a trademark and service mark of Barclays Bank Plc (collectively with its affiliates, “Barclays”), used under license. Bloomberg or Bloomberg’s licensors, including Barclays, own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Barclays Indices. Neither Bloomberg nor Barclays approves or endorses this material, or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.

©Morningstar 2020. All rights reserved. Used with permission. Use of this content requires expert knowledge. It is to be used by specialist institutions only. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied, adapted or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar not its content providers are responsible for any damage or losses arising from any use of this information, except where such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by law in your jurisdiction. Past financial performance is no guarantee of future results.